Why WeDispatch
Give your articles a voice without spending time on it or sacrificing quality. Here's what WeDispatch changes compared to the alternatives.
| WeDispatch | Manual recording | Generic TTS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional French voices | ✓ | ✓ | ~ |
| Audio generated automatically at publication | ✓ | ✕ | ~ |
| One-line integration (any CMS) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Text preparation (acronyms, numbers, times) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Article updates without re-billing | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Embedded player + listen statistics | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Scales to hundreds of articles/month | ✓ | ✕ | ~ |
| Cost per article | Low | High | Low |
Recording it yourself: quality, but not scale
A human voice is excellent — but recording, editing and publishing the audio of every article costs time and money, and doesn't hold up when you publish several articles a day. WeDispatch keeps professional quality while generating the audio automatically, in seconds, the moment you publish.
Generic text-to-speech: scale, but no integration
Raw synthesis readers (browser extensions, generic TTS) read the text as-is: acronyms spelled out wrong, numbers mispronounced, no spoken-language preparation, and above all no integration into your publishing pipeline and no listen tracking. WeDispatch prepares the text for reading, installs in one line, and shows you what your readers actually listen to.
Doing nothing: the engagement you let slip
Your readers listen in the car, at the gym, while cooking. Without an audio version, that audience doesn't read you. Audio is also accessibility — and more time spent on your content.
The simplest thing is to listen
Try the result on your own text, then take a look at the plans.
A specific need (press group, custom CMS)? Let's talk