A custom voice for your site: what it costs, and when it is worth it

The question comes up as soon as a newsroom takes audio seriously: can we have a voice of our own, that nobody else uses, rather than one picked from a shared library? The answer is yes, and this article is about the part people discuss least: the price. Not the idea of a recognisable voice, which is a matter of editorial strategy and is covered elsewhere, but the concrete calculation you will put in front of whoever holds the budget.

Two costs, not one

A custom voice is paid for at two moments, and that distinction is what matters.

The first is creation. A voice actor records a sample, and that recording becomes a model able to read any text afterwards in that timbre. With us, this creation is a one-time payment of 199€. It is the setup cost: it is due only once, when the voice is put in place on your account, and it does not come back every month. Setup is done with hands-on help, not self-service: the voice is placed on your account, checked, and tied to it alone.

The second cost is usage, and this is where you need to be precise, because this is the one that runs over time. Consumption is counted in credits, and one credit is a thousand characters, whether for a new reading or a correction. With a catalogue voice, a thousand-character article uses one credit; a four-thousand-character article uses four. An article read in a cloned voice, however, counts for three times as much: the same four-thousand-character article uses twelve credits instead of four. That factor of three is not a hidden surcharge, it is the real cost of a dedicated premium voice, and it is written into the model rather than improvised at billing time.

The sum nobody does before signing

Put in your own numbers. If you publish thirty articles a month, around three thousand characters each, a catalogue voice costs you ninety credits a month (thirty articles, three credits each). The same output in a cloned voice uses two hundred and seventy credits: three times more. The exact price of a credit depends on the volume you reserve (it is a slider, not a fixed grid), but the ratio does not move: a custom voice triples your monthly consumption, on top of the 199€ for creation.

This sum is not an argument against. It is there so the decision is made with eyes open. A custom voice has real value, and it builds up through repetition: hearing the same voice again and again, a listener ends up associating it with you, like a typeface or a musical signature. But that value is built over years, not over a quarter, and that is exactly why the running usage cost weighs more than the 199€ at the start in the real decision.

What you already get without a cloned voice, and tend to forget

Before paying for a dedicated voice, check what you already have. The premium catalogue voice is included on every paid plan: there is no per-article surcharge to use it. The quality gap between the best catalogue voices and a studio recording has narrowed to the point where most listeners can no longer place it. The one thing the catalogue does not give you is exclusivity: another publisher can choose the same voice. For most titles that weighs far less than feared, because a listener compares you with your own past output, not with a competitor they do not listen to. And before choosing anything, the right reflex is to listen: the method for evaluating a neural voice applies just as well to a catalogue voice as to a cloned sample.

Cloning is not offered on the free plan: it is a paid-account option, which fits the fact that it involves a real person and a hands-on setup.

When a custom voice is genuinely worth it

It is justified when the voice is part of your brand in the same way your name is: a morning show, an already-identified podcast, a founder or presenter whose voice already carries recognition. In those cases, the factor of three on usage buys something precise: an audio identity nobody else can copy. It is not justified in order to be "better" in general: if you simply want a good French voice to read your articles, the catalogue already contains it, included, and the money for a cloned voice would be better spent elsewhere.

One last point, which is not a cost in euros but is a cost all the same: a cloned voice is the image of a real person, and it involves written consent, a scope of use and a way to revoke it. Those obligations, and how a recognisable voice is built and sometimes fails, are set out in the signature voice. Reading quality itself does not change depending on whether the voice comes from the catalogue or from cloning: the same French normalisation applies upstream, the one we stand for on the French text to speech page. A custom voice changes who the voice belongs to, not how French is read aloud.

Read next

• Connect your RSS feed: audio follows what you publish, without voicing the whole archive
• French text typed without accents: what a synthetic voice makes of it
• Does the audio player set cookies? What it actually adds to your site